Bug 20859 - [Dashboard] – Inconsistent Employee Search Behavior with Filter Button.
Summary: [Dashboard] – Inconsistent Employee Search Behavior with Filter Button.
Status: REJECTED
Alias: None
Product: 1095 64-bit Mac - 2026
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Dashboard (show other bugs)
Version: 26.0.0 Ver-01
Hardware: MAC macOS Sequoia
: Medium Minor
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: G.Shivasai
QA Contact:
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2026-08-07 11:39 IST by G.Shivasai
Modified: 2026-11-05 18:11 IST (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description G.Shivasai 2026-08-07 11:39:42 IST
The employee search behavior is inconsistent with the presence of the Filter button.

Currently, when I enters an employee name in the search field, the matching employee is displayed automatically without clicking the Filter button. This makes the Filter button appear unnecessary.

STEPS:
=> Create an employer and multiple employees.
=> Navigate to the Dashboard.
=> Enter the name of a specific employee in the search field.
=> Observe that the employee is displayed immediately, even without clicking the Filter button.

Current Behavior:
Search results are displayed automatically as I enter and the Filter button is not required to perform the search.

Expected Behavior:
The application should follow one consistent approach:

 Option 1 (Recommended): If the search is intended to be automatic, remove the Filter button from the UI.

 Option 2: If the Filter button is intended to control the search, the application should display results only after the user clicks the Filter button.

Screen Record:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1LovY6Xrn3GsCFOU_-875KtrOQo3HJGsd/view?usp=sharing
Comment 1 Sreenivasa 2026-09-15 12:05:08 IST
It is appreciated to have appropriate comments before changing the but status
Comment 2 nvkunal@checkmark.in 2026-09-15 15:01:53 IST
This is working as a live application.
Comment 3 nvkunal@checkmark.in 2026-11-05 18:11:11 IST
I discussed it with Bhavani ma'am, its working as an expected.